Julie Clawson

onehandclapping

Menu
  • Home
  • About Julie
  • About onehandclapping
  • Writings
  • Contact
Menu

Random Thoughts on Children’s Television

Posted on February 19, 2007July 7, 2025

I have a toddler. And although I am anal about certain parenting issues, TV isn’t one of them. So Emma gets to watch TV. But with the wonderful new addition of TiVo to our household, I now have much greater control of the programs she watches. No longer am I stuck with whatever PBS Kid’s Sprout has on (goodbye Barney and Sagwa), and Emma can have her Elmo and Dora fix whenever she desires. And while she still likes a few things I find seriously annoying (Teletubbies and the new Veggie Tales), I generally like Sesame Street and Dora the Explorer (which is a good thing, since I see a lot of them). So what is it I like about them?

It’s hard not to like Sesame Street since I grew up watching it (which btw is the theme of its current advertising campaign). I like the diversity it portrays, its acceptance of all people and monsters, and the basic skills it teaches kids. And as I was noticing recently, it has philosophically evolved with the times to become more postmodern. When I was a child, I remember watching a segment/game called “one of these things is not like the others.” In this game, kids were expected to use logic and reason to deduce which item by its outward appearance was different from the others. The game is still played on current episodes, but now with a postmodern twist. There isn’t necessarily one right answer. Somethings may look different but in reality be the same as everything else. And there may be aspects of a thing that aren’t apparent on the surface that in reality set it apart. Multiple answers, multiple perspectives, multiple truths. I like that.

Dora is a bit different. (As Kevin Smith pointed out, Dora only works for adults who are high…) I like the bilingual language skills it teaches, but I had an issue with how it labels its characters. One of the characters, a fox, is named Swiper, because he swipes stuff. I do not support enforcing negative behavior by causing a child to self-identify with that behavior. Label a kid “trouble-maker” and he will live up to that name. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy. So I’m not too comfortable with how that’s modeled on Dora. (BTW, Swiper is Emma’s favorite character). But then I just saw an episode where Swiper gets into a bad predicament (a genie tricks him into switching places in a bottle with him). Instead of being happy that Swiper was in trouble or saying he got what he deserved, Dora, Boots, and their friends immediately offered to help Swiper. They felt sorry for him and did whatever they could to help him out. That’s the type lesson in love and mercy that I want Emma to learn.

So for all the junk that is out there, there are a few good things on TV. And yes, I’m overthinking children’s TV, but somedays that’s all I got to think about…

Read more

Where to Buy Fair Trade

Posted on February 18, 2007July 7, 2025

After my last post and discussing these issues at church today, I’ve had a few people ask where to buy fair trade goods. Here are a few options.

In the west/southwest Chicago suburbs –

Trader Joes – Glen Ellyn, Batavia – coffee, tea, chocolate
Whole Foods – Wheaton – coffee and tea
Ten Thousand Villages – Glen Ellyn – coffee, tea, chocolate, rice, beans, heath supplies, decor
Village Grind – Oswego, Yorkville – coffee
Caribou Coffee – Rainforest blend coffee
Jewel – some coffee, tea

Online retailers –

Fair Trade at Amazon – buy coffee, chocolate, tea, sugar, candy, rice, and salsas.

Equal Exchange – coffee, tea, and chocolate

Global Exchange – coffee, tea, chocolate, gifts

Click here for more links.

Read more

End Global Slavery

Posted on February 17, 2007July 7, 2025

www.amazinggracesunday.com

So tomorrow is Amazing Grace Sunday. Yes, this is a commercial tie-in to help promote a movie, but its for a good cause and raises awareness, so I don’t care. The movie Amazing Grace tells the story of abolitionists William Wilberforce who helped bring the UK slave trade to an end and inspired the abolitionist movement in the USA. The producers have partnered with churches and numerous human rights agencies to get the message out that slavery isn’t just a thing of the past. Slavery is still a vicious force in our world today and there is serious need for modern day abolitionists.

There are estimated 27 million people in slavery in the world today and half of them are children. Modern day slavery exists in the form of women and children sold into prostitution. Children forced to join the military in a kill or be killed scenario. Workers who think they are signing up for a decent job, but who are tricked into giving up their passports, losing their identity (and legal recourse), and made to work for little to no pay. Children who are kidnapped and trafficked to another country to work in mines, fields, or factories. Families who take a loan to pay medical bills and are forced to have their children “work off” the loan; but who discover that the high interest rates and abuse equal slavery for that child. Workers who although legally “free’ are abused, forced into sex and abortions, and threatened so that they can keep a job and food on the table. Parents who can’t refuse the high price offered for their young daughter’s virgin night, but who then disown her (and condemn her to prostitution) for being impure in a society that values a girls purity above her person. Those are just some of the faces of modern day slavery.

I’ve been aware of these issues for a few years now and have supported the work of agencies like International Justice Mission. IJM uses legal process to free people from bonded labor and forced prostitution. Instead of aiding the system and buying the freedom of the slaves, they make governments stick to their anti-slavery laws (often ignored) to legally free the slaves and prosecute the slaveholders. There are a number of agencies that work to end slavery, but the problem is still huge. And as I researched all this recently for our discussion at church, it stuck me how much I was part of the problem. No, I don’t own slaves, deny people their rights, or participate in the sex trade but I buy products from companies that do. It is my dollar and purchasing power that funds modern day slavery. I often care more about getting a good deal than I do about the people who made whatever cheap item I’m buying. Or I’m too lazy to find out where an item is made. Granted, it’s very hard to discover the sources of a lot of products and then to discover if they make use of slave labor. Human rights watch websites are a big help in discovering which companies are under investigation (or have been convicted of) human rights violations. I have discovered that if a company is making an effort to be ethical, making sure none of their products come from slave labor sources, and are using their resources to better their workers then they want you to know about it. The harder it is to find a company’s source information, the more likely it seems that they use unethical practices.

Example – chocolate. 40% of the world’s cocoa is grown on the Ivory Coast and is sold to chocolate makers like Nestle, Hershey’s, and Mars/M&M. The U.S. State Department Human Rights Report on the Ivory Coast for 2003 estimates that approximately 109,000 child laborers worked in hazardous conditions on cocoa farms in what has been described as the worst form of child labor. Many of those children were kidnapped from other countries and trafficked in as slaves. In 2001 US Congress. Representative Eliot Engel (D-NY) had introduced an amendment to the 2002 Agriculture Appropriations Bill to set aside $250,000 for the Food and Drug Administration to develop “slave free” labeling requirements on cocoa products. The bill was approved in the House of Representatives by a vote of 291-115 in June 2001. Given the multimillion-dollar trade in cocoa between the U.S. and The Ivory Coast, the bill would have had a tremendous impact on the chocolate industry. In response, the chocolate industry stopped the bill by agreeing to voluntarily adopt key portions of the bill as the Harkin-Engel Protocol. This (surprisingly?) didn’t work. The deadline slipped by without the companies complying. Legal action is being pursued, but nothing has yet to be enforced (including US customs law prohibiting the importing of products made by child labor). Read the whole report here. So as I the consumer buy most chocolate I am supporting human trafficking and child slave labor.

One modern day abolitionist has come up with a creative strategy to bring attention to this issue. Recently a Dutch journalist asked an Amsterdam court to convict him for eating chocolate, saying by doing so he was benefiting from child slavery on cocoa farms in Ivory Coast. Teun van de Keuken, 35, is seeking a jail sentence to raise consumer awareness and force the cocoa and chocolate industry to take tougher measures to stamp out child labour. “If I am found guilty of this crime, any chocolate consumer can be prosecuted after that. I hope that people would stop buying chocolate and thus hurt the sales of big corporations and make them do something about the problem,” van de Keuken said.

Interesting. Luckily chocolate is one of the few things that can easily be bought fairly traded. In buying chocolate (or coffee, tea, or sugar) with the Fair Trade label, one can be sure that you are not support slavery or other unethical practices towards workers. This doesn’t mean giving up chocolate, it just means having to stop being a brainless, callous consumer and instead use our buying power to let companies know what we do and don’t support.

I know that this is a complicated issues with many facets and causes. There is no simple solution. But I don’t see that as an excuse to give up and and not care about our brothers and sisters. If we can do what we can where we can, make one life better, and start to change the world for the better – why not?

Here are some resources to help you get started in finding out more and discovering what you can do to help –

The Amazing Change – discover more about becoming a modern day abolitionist and sign the petition to end global slavery.
World Vision – A Christian advocacy group working to stop injustice worldwide.
International Justice Mission – a human rights agency that rescues victims of violence, sexual exploitation, slavery, and oppression.
Not for Sale – A popular culture call to end slavery.
Stop the Traffik – international organization that helps raise awareness of human trafficking and rescues victims.
Coalition to Stop the Use of Child Soldiers – works to prevent the recruitment and use of children as soldiers, to secure their demobilisation and to ensure their rehabilitation and reintegration into society.
War Slavery – An advocacy group focused on ending human trafficking by companies under Defense Department contracts in Iraq.

“You hear, O LORD, the desire of the afflicted; you encourage them, and you listen to their cry, defending the fatherless and the oppressed, in order that man, who is of the earth, may terrify no more.”
Psalm 10:17-18

Read more

Sin, Discipline, and Vengeance

Posted on February 13, 2007July 7, 2025

In reading recently about discipline for home and school, I was struck by how our conception of sin influences how we approach discipline. Granted some sort of connection seems obvious, but I was intrigued by the difference it made in whether behavior and discipline became an individual or communal thing.

In the traditions I have been exposed to sin is viewed as an individual action. You commit a specific act – break a specific rule and you have committed a sin. Sin is a concrete thing that you (individual you) do. It is a very self-oriented/ it’s all about me sort of thing. The focus is on what I have done wrong and then on how God will either punish or forgive me. I must repent of those sins for my own sake. I choose not to sin based on the reward or punishment I will receive. I ask – Will this send me to hell? Will this hurt my prayer life? Will this get me to heaven?

If sin is viewed less as concrete acts, but more as a state of the heart the issue becomes communal instead of individual. If being in sin means having a broken relationship with God or with others (failing to love God and love others with all your heart, soul, mind, and strength), the focus is shifted away from ourselves. Instead of focusing on ourselves, we put God and others before ourselves. Their needs and feeling become what is important. We choose not to sin because we care about God and others – we don’t want to cause them pain. Caring for others is a value that is then upheld and the basis for the good things one does.

But the self-centered view of sin is what dominates our churches, homes, and schools. Children are not taught to care for others or to be aware of their needs. They are instead encouraged to make sure their own butt is covered and to tattle when others perform a wrong action. Instead of being encouraged to love misbehaving kids, understand why they acted out or made a mistake, and help them find solutions, our kids are forced to view these kids as bad examples who must be punished and ridiculed. The messages of love, humility, and compassion are ignored in a discipline structure where it’s every man for himself. Why do we ignore Philippians 2:3-4 – “Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit, but in humility consider others better than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others”?

One of the worst examples of this is how our modern Christian culture has taken a Bible passage originally intended to help restore relationships and made it a mandate for personal vendetta. The whole “eye for an eye” concept severely restricted vengeance back in the day. It called for a one for one exchange instead of the typical escalation of violence common back then (you killed my friend, so I will kill your friend, then your friend kill my friends, then my friends… until whoever is bigger, more powerful, or just more numerous wins). So instead of dragging a whole tribe into a petty argument and disturbing the peace (as well as economics, agriculture, the lives of all the innocents) vengeance was restricted. But even when Jesus’ words are completely ignored (Matthew 5:38-39 “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye, and tooth for tooth.’But I tell you, Do not resist an evil person. If someone strikes you on the right cheek, turn to him the other also.”), this passage is taken as justification or a mandate to harm others instead of a way to help control violence and maintain peace. It become about getting our need for vengeance satisfied and not about loving others.

So if I want to take the Great Commandment seriously (‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your strength and with all your mind’; and, ‘Love your neighbor as yourself) I need to examine if that is the message I am sending in how I talk about sin and in how I discipline. If my desire is for Emma to be a person who loves God and loves others, are the things I say to her and the ways I discipline her serving to achieve that end? If not, am I willing to sacrifice habits, rote responses, and what may be easy in order to change?

Read more

Ancient Near East History

Posted on February 6, 2007July 7, 2025

So I mentioned the other day about the show Exodus Decoded and that I would comment on it later. Well, Mike posted some thoughts about it here. He gives a brief overview of the history and the theories from the show. As I have also been reading Empires of the Word: A Language History of the World by Nicholas Ostler, we’ve been having some fascinating discussions about ancient near east history. There is so much of interest there that I want to know more about. It is a period often ignored in schools and literalistic biblical interpretation gave us a one sided view of that time (and I even studied history in college…). So its been fun discussing the ideas (yes we are nerds) and I recommend Mike’s post if you are interested in the topic.

Read more

New Seven Wonders Update

Posted on February 3, 2007July 7, 2025

The latest update for the voting on the New Seven Wonders of the World is out. The ranking haven’t changed much since the last update, but here are the current standings –

Top 7
Colosseum, Great Wall, Machu Picchu, Petra, Pyramids of Giza, Statues of Easter Island, Taj Mahal

Middle 7
Acropolis, Angkor, Chichen Itza, Christ Redeemer, Eiffel Tower, Kremlin/St. Basil’s, Stonehenge

Bottom 7
Alhambra, Hagia Sophia, Kiyomizu Temple, Neuschwanstein Castle, Statue of Liberty, Sydney Opera House, Timbuktu

They have over 25 million votes from all over the world. And what’s cool is that children can actually have a voice in this as well. The site has a educational exploration section for kids. So kids can discover all about the nominated sites and then cast their votes. The results – the new official Seven Wonders of the World – will be announced 7-7-07. There is still time to vote and join the fun. Click below to vote.

Vote for the new 7 world wonders

Read more

Will We Finally Get Some Answers???

Posted on February 2, 2007July 7, 2025

The date has been released – July 21, 2007. So we only have a few short months until the epic ends. Is Snape good or evil, will he sacrifice himself for Harry? Will Harry (or Neville) kill Voldemort or will either be killed? Will good triumph over evil or is the world more complex than that – will Voldemort be redeemed? Can you tell, I’m looking forward to the release of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows? Now if we can just get some answers for us LOST fans…

Read more

Questions, Epistemology, and Late Night TV

Posted on February 1, 2007July 7, 2025

Last night Mike and I stayed up way too late watching one of those history channel programs (we have TiVo, so there really is no need to stay up late, it was just that interesting). This one was called Exodus Decoded. Unlike most of those type shows, I thought this one was well done and was worth a viewing. Basically the show examined extra-biblical evidence for the exodus. What I liked about it was that it took a “big picture” interdisciplinary approach to the topic. The show presented some fascinating interpretations and evidences for the Exodus. I don’t want to get into all those now (but it really was intriguing maybe I’ll comment on it later), but instead comment on what it got me thinking about. These thoughts are also sparked from the conversation about Ruth’s virtue over at Swinging from the Vine.

My question is – why are we so afraid to really question everything? Why when approaching theology or history do we set boundaries and assumptions that cannot be changed or questioned before we turn to actual research? For example, for those who believe miracles are impossible the exodus could never have occurred because it involves miraculous events. Or because we have to hold to a certain dating system for all the rest of our theology to fall into place, these facts and dates over here must be thrown out because they conflict with our presumed ideas. Or because we want to hold Ruth up as a female role model (and since we define role models as chaste/virtuous women) there is no room to even explore the question of whether Ruth had sex with Boaz when she spent the night with him at his “feet.” Or because I work in X field and you work in Y field we can’t get together and share ideas and perhaps come up with a holistic understanding of things. Or because one belongs to a different religion (Islam) and doesn’t want to strengthen another religion (Judaism/Christianity) any researchers looking into Jewish history are forbidden from doing research in our country. And yes these are vaguely stated, but it really bugs me when knowledge is stifled because people are too afraid or too prejudiced.

I know I make assumptions, you have to in order to progress in understanding. One needs to assume that the possibility of the exodus story having happened is a valid possibility in order to start looking for evidence that it did happen. There are also things that I have questioned and have chosen to believe in (like the existence of God) that become the basis for how I look at other aspects of life. But I still concede the necessity to be allowed to question those basic assumptions. My views on a lot of things have drastically changed in the last 10 years. Why? Because the pastor at my old church convinced me that it was okay to question my pre-trib/pre-mil views. I realized that true understanding requires everything to be open to being questioned (which eventually led to my being forced out of that very church). And yes, new ideas that I have formed can also be questioned (but no, to all the people who assume that I am “liberal” because I haven’t thought through things, I doubt I will return to where I have already been). But it scares me when I see people claiming that we can’t “go there” or that certain topics are off limits or that certain facts must be ignored – how is this intellectual honesty?? (and yes, I’m sure I scare some people as well with my assumptions…)

What are people afraid of? Do people still hold to foundationalist epistemology – question one thing and the whole structure crumbles? Are we just afraid of anything new or different? Will we lose our funding, our prestige, or our job? Are to just too comfortable to care? Are any or all of these things more important than the pursuit of truth?

I’m frustrated when I encounter resistance to questioning (as I’m sure some feel about me). I’m frustrated when I don’t have the knowledge or the resources to pursue my questioning fully. I’m frustrated with my stupidity and lack of training to engage in dialogue in certain fields. I know I should just deal with it and do what I can, but there are some days when it just build up…

So sorry for the postmodernish incoherent rant. This has just been on my mind all day and I had to get it out.

Tags: Exodus Decoded, epistemology, History Channel
Read more

The Homework Myth – Suggestions

Posted on January 31, 2007July 7, 2025

So while Alfie Kohn in The Homework Myth questions the need to assign homework as the default option, he also proposes a few ways to make homework better if it must be assigned.

First, homework should never be assigned for the sake of homework. For every assignment given, it should be asked what theory of learning is at its base? Does it involve active or passive learning? Does it have students wrestling with ideas or do they just have to follow directions? If the homework doesn’t actually contribute to real learning, it shouldn’t be assigned.

Homework should be given if it is an activity that is suited for the home. The question should be asked – why can’t this be done at school? Homework should make a meaningful connection between learning taking place at school and life at home. It shouldn’t take away from life at home, but enrich and expand it. So projects where a child interviews a parent or experiments in the kitchen help make those connections.

Homework should help children engage in natural learning with adults. Interactive and intergenerational activities like cooking, doing crosswords, and surfing the internet strengthen the family and learning. Doing normal activities together is more organic and does more for “family values” than the nightly fights that homework brings to most families.

The best homework is just asking children to read (or be read to) books of their choosing. The value of sustained reading is tremendous and gives children ownership of their learning. The truncated out-of-context articles children usually have to read for the sole purpose of learning vocabulary doesn’t do much for them. Neither does imposing random constraints on the reading like assigning a certain number of pages or minutes or rewarding the child for doing something enjoyable. (students who used to get lost in books will stop reading after the quota has been met). IMHO this would have been the perfect type of homework. I always complained that I never had time to read because I had too much homework (which I remember consisting of massive amounts of worksheets).

And it should always be kept in mind that children are expected to live their life. They need time to read for pleasure, make friends and socialize with them, get some exercise, go to church, get some rest, or just be a child. Jobs (and school is a child’s job) that take up all your time day and night are not healthy (ha, speaking as someone in ministry…). There has to be time for self-reflection, creativity, family, and community. Some things are far more valuable than giving into a system that doesn’t even support the same basic values as you do.

Read more

The Homework Myth – Equal Opportunity Learning

Posted on January 30, 2007July 7, 2025

In my continuing posting on Alfie Kohn’s The Homework Myth, I want to explore one more reason Kohn gives for why homework is bad. He of course explores a variety of more reasons, but these are the ones that stood out to me. I plan to also post a summary of his suggestions for how to improve homework if it must be given.

Kohn argues that for teachers to rely on homework to teach students widens the gap between the haves and the have nots. Disadvantaged students don’t have the same resources and home aid as middle class students. In many cases parents are expected to check over the student’s homework and are often sent notes home if they fail to catch a mistake. This had led many parents to have to spend much of their evenings relearning things in exactly the system their child’s teacher (that year) wants them to do things. Since it is up to them to make sure that the homework is correct, many parents have opted to give their kids a life and do their homework for them. While this of course doesn’t lead to any real learning on the child’s part, it does guarantee them the reward of a good grade. Since good grades are often valued over learning, this system isn’t often challenged.

But what about the students who don’t have educated parents with lots of free time at home? Who don’t have a way to get to the library or access to the internet? Who don’t have the extra cash to make the diorama that will meet expectations? And so forth. Kohn insists that if teachers are set on still assigning that sort of homework, they must assure that all students are provided with equal resources to complete those assignments. The school or community must provide before and afterschool learning/resource centers where the students have access to the same equipment and help that less disadvantaged students have.

Providing equal resources will not solve all the issues or eliminate equality, but it can help prevent the gap from widening any further. But it will take examining expectations, creative planning, and more caring allocation of money in order to provide equal opportunity learning. Basically it will take hard work. Are teachers, administrators, and tax payers willing to help prevent continuing economic (and hence usually racial) inequality or do they just want to maintain the status quo (discriminatory system) because it requires less work?

Read more
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • …
  • 83
  • Next
Julie Clawson

Julie Clawson
[email protected]
Writer, mother, dreamer, storyteller...

Search

Archives

Categories

"Everything in life is writable about if you have the outgoing guts to do it, and the imagination to improvise." - Sylvia Plath

All Are Welcome Here

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Instagram
Buy me a coffee QR code
Buy Me a Coffee
©2025 Julie Clawson | Theme by SuperbThemes