Julie Clawson

onehandclapping

Menu
  • Home
  • About Julie
  • About onehandclapping
  • Writings
  • Contact
Menu

Month: February 2008

Adapting Our Stereotypes

Posted on February 11, 2008July 10, 2025

The world runs on stereotypes. We expect people to fit into certain boxes and shape our society around those boxes. Those that don’t fit, well, we just let them fall through the cracks. They don’t count, they aren’t normal, if they want to make it they should start acting just like everyone else. The problem is – more and more people are falling through the cracks and systems, flawed to begin with, are falling apart.

I was reminded of how our world is changing as I recently followed the saga of a local Chicago area 1st grader who was barred from attending school for nearly two months. This boy officially lives with his mom in the Homewood school district, but stays with his dad in a different district some nights (and occasionally with his grandmother as well). His parents are divorced and both work so-called “non-traditional” jobs (as in their hours aren’t 8-5). But in a school system that’s strapped for cash, the boy doesn’t spend enough nights at one house to quality for residency and so was barred from attending school. It took the state governor reading about the boy’s story in the newspaper for him to intervene and demand that the boy be allowed to attend school. (read more here and here). The boy and his family didn’t fit the mold and so he was allowed to fall through the cracks (thankfully the press can still do some good). But the thing is, his story is becoming more and more common these days. The world is changing.

I can’t help but think about how the church is responding to these changes. Are we making room for “nontraditional” families and schedules? Or do we just complain about divorce rates, the stability of the family, women working outside the home, and the taxes we pay to the schools to deal with people “like this”? Nurses, and artists, and traveling jobs are more the norm these days than ever. What was once considered “typical” barely exists anymore. The stereotypes and molds have crumbled, so why does the church pretend that nothings changed? A few years ago I was at a church that started a Saturday night service. This allowed a few families with “nontraditional” schedules (who had to work Sundays) to attend church. But there were others in the church who opposed the service saying the only reason people would come to church on Saturday night was because they were too lazy to get up on Sunday mornings.

Divorce is a reality, alternative families are a reality, and nontraditional schedules are a reality across every economic level these days. If all the church does is complain about it and try to make it stop, all that will happen is for the church to make itself obsolete. Refusing to accept the realities of this world in favor of some nostalgic stereotype of the world as we wish it would be doesn’t seem like a smart way to serve our communities. The church needn’t be a system that falls apart as culture evolves, but it does need to learn to adapt and stop rejecting change for the sake of rejecting change. Perhaps that means emerging, perhaps that means just opening its eyes to the community it serves. As a church leader I know I personally find it difficult to even know where to begin sometimes, but for the sake of the community I serve I at least want to try.

Read more

Defining and Defending the Blog

Posted on February 10, 2008July 10, 2025

This past week fellow Daily Scribe blogger Nick Norelli asked the following questions on his blog – “Is a blog a blog if it doesn’t allow comments? And if it is then is it a blog worth reading?” My initial response was to answer “no” to both questions. Something may perhaps fit the technical definition of a blog and may even contain good information, but in my opinion, a good blog is one that allows conversation, that invites interaction and doesn’t hide dissenting opinions. I find blogs where the authors pontificate on their own opinions but don’t allow questions or criticisms to represent the height of arrogance. It’s even worse when comments appear to be allowed, but dissenting opinions are deleted or edited or when only pre-approved voices are allowed access. Now I’ve deleted a handful of comments here, but only the spam and the super-creepy sexual ones. I prefer the open comment policy. But from my experience the bloggers who don’t allow comments aren’t interested in conversation at all – just in attempting to get everyone to think they are right. They tell the world what to believe, or (more commonly) ridicule ideas or people they don’t like and then walk away. Sure some bloggers don’t have time to respond to every comment, but not allowing commentary at all seems like a way of avoiding responsibility for one’s opinions. But then again, I’m not a fan of having some authority on high telling me what I should believe without allowing me to question or examine their ideas.

These questions reminded me of the recent discussion we had over at the Emerging Women blog regarding the benefits blogging has brought to marginalized voices. In the church world where the voices of white men predominate (or are at least perceived to do so), blogs have provided women and others on the margins with the opportunity to have a voice. So I find it interesting that it is generally white males in positions of power who don’t allow comments on their blogs or who complain (on their blog) about too many voices out there blogging. Why? Some dislike the open source nature of blog discussion preferring instead good old traditional authority. Others think there are too many voices out there for conversation to be meaningful and therefore blogging should be restricted (to those with authority perhaps?). Others don’t like giving the “uneducated” or “unsupervised” the opportunity to have a voice. And perhaps some just want theirs to be the only voice that gets heard.

I admit, there can be issues with blogs. I’ve encountered the crazies out there (blogrush is such great entertainment – did you know that aliens will aid Jesus in his second coming by bringing him to Roswell??), I see the dangers of posting pictures of yourself partying in Cancun that any potential employer can google, and I’ve stuck my foot in my mouth on a few too many occasions – but I still support the freedoms it brings. I like that blogging helps me to examine my world and think critically about ideas I encounter. I like that I get pushed to justify my opinions (not that I always succeed at doing so). I like that as a mom who is often confined to the house I can have adult conversations and maintain friendships with people around the world. I like that women are breaking free from the lies the church has told them and realizing that yes, they can do theology and have a voice in these sorts of discussions. Without the blog many post-evangelical women would be left with no one to talk to, no one to encourage them, and no way to move forward in their faith. So for a man who has never experienced the same confines and dismissal as these women to say that our blogs are just noise that need to go away in order for the important voices to be better heard really irks me (even though I know that most of the men making such statements are not necessarily directing them at women).

I’m all for the conversation. I want to learn from others and I want to question, challenge, and clarify what I read online. To me, such interaction is the trademark of a good discussion, a good educational setting, or a good church not to mention a good blog. I find it frustrating these days to listen to a sermon or read a book and not be able to push deeper by questioning it. I recall the most frustrating classes in college were the ones where the profs refused to respond to questions – instead saying meaningless things like “that’s a good question” and continue on with their lecture. I didn’t want more notes to take, I wanted to engage with what I was learning. Blogs have provided me with that opportunity to continue learning by engaging my world. Sure I enjoy “real-life” conversations, but once a month or so is far too infrequent and I don’t have the babysitting funds for much more (and don’t even get me started on the local Feminist Thought Club I tried to join which ended up being a bunch of college guys trying to pick up women…). I need more than that.  So I am grateful for blogs and for the discussion they should support. I am not afraid of the hard questions nor do I think the “simple questions” are just creating noise. The opportunity to read and engage daily with others is needed at this stage in my life. For me, it’s what helps me grow.

Read more

Thoughts on Lost

Posted on February 9, 2008July 10, 2025

So I feel like I should give some sort of commentary on the new season on Lost.  I’m just happy to jump back into the story.  I like following a mystery over a multi-year period as it just gets more and more complex.  And this season has thrown in twists that question any assumptions we have made so far in the series.  So a few things that have stood out to me this season –

So far the show has been a story of salvation/redemption.  The characters face the demons of their past and generally reach some sort of healing.  (well, then they die and “leave” the island…)  So I found the language used in the recap episode which asked “will the survivors be saved” intriguing.  They didn’t use the tern rescued, but saved.  But as we now see flash-forwards into the future, the demons remain for some.  I’m interested to see how this develops.

What is primary on my mind right now is the significance of the new character Charlotte Staples Lewis.  The writers of this show do not make throw away literary references, so the blatant C.S. Lewis reference has to mean something.  We already have a John Locke and a D. Hume.  And when Ben showed up using the name Henry Gale, any Wizard of Oz fan knew him to be a fake (although I found Ben’s acceptance of Sawyer nicknaming him Yoda this past week amusing).  So what’s the Lewis reference?  Is it a Narnia alternate world reference?  A Great Divorce purgatory reference? (which I know the producers have denied)?  A Screwtape allusion?  Or just a religious or academic idea?

Any ideas?

Read more

Children, Violence, and Veggie Tales

Posted on February 7, 2008July 10, 2025

This series of rambling questions is posted in the “why yes, I do have a toddler” category.

I am not a fan of violence and I try to prevent exposing my child to situations that model violence. That said, I have to wonder at some of the strategies to avoid exposing kids to violence and/or death, that take things (in my opinion at least) a bit too far. For example, I’ve had other parents freak out when I talk to Emma that the cute little cows and chickens at the zoo are like what we eat for dinner (apparently they didn’t want their kids to know that). And I once had a parent get upset because during a Children’s Church Easter lesson I told her elementary aged son that Jesus shed his blood on the cross and died. They were committed Christians, but she was appalled that I would mention the death of Jesus to children in church. I guess I was just supposed to stick to “safe” bible stories approved for children like Noah’s Ark and David and Goliath (sarcasm fully intended).

I was noticing this strange habit to shield children from death and violence the other day as I was watching Veggie Tales with Emma. Now I’ve been a fan of Veggie Tales for years (I did live in Wheaton during it’s heyday). On Friday nights when we weren’t studying, my friends and I would get together to watch Veggie Tale videos (aren’t you wishing you went to a Christian college too…). Anyway, what I noticed recently was the transformation over the years of the costumes for the Pirates Who Don’t Do Anything. In the original silly song by that name, Pa Grape sports a pirate hat complete with traditional skull and crossbones. But by the time those Pirates host the Silly Song countdown, the skull and crossbones have been replaced by a smiley face with an eyepatch (both can be observed in the video here). Then in the Jonah movie such references to real pirates have disappeared in favor of a tic-tac-toe game on the hat. The recent Pirates Who Don’t Do Anything movie (produced under new owners) returned to a design reminiscent of the skulls and crossbones but which uses a “P” and fork and knife.

Okay so perhaps I am a bit too obsessed with Veggie Tales, but I have to wonder what happened. Did Christian parents pressure them to remove the elements pertaining to death and violence? Veggie Tales has a history of giving into such parental pressure like when they changed the lyrics to “The Bunny Song.” Apparently parents didn’t like a song about idolatry that prompted kids to say they “don’t love my mom or my dad, just the bunny” or that they won’t go to church or school (the new version just mentions not eating soup and getting a tummy-ache from eating chocolate bunnies, it’s not nearly as catchy). Obviously the message is – children can’t understand idolatry and must be shielded from death and violence all the time.

Somedays I really don’t get it. We protect the kids by putting metal detectors in schools and refuse to let them wear multiple layers in class (for fear of hidden weapons). As a substitute teacher (who kept my winter coat on all day) I saw kids unable to hold pencils they were so cold and who stood outside in the sleet with no coat during a fire drill for over an hour. How did the rules protect these kids? Then there were the Chicago area police who recently had to escort an elderly Chinese man off a playground/park for practicing traditional exercises with short swords because (they said) it might be upsetting to people. Somewhat understandable, but then why are our parks and VFWs decorated with massive weaponry (tanks, bombers, cannons)?

Is there any standard? Do people have any clue what they are doing or what it is they are attempting to protect children from? When have we gone too far in the sheltering of children? Is refusing to talk about blood or bones or where or food comes from a deception on the level of Santa Claus or the Tooth Fairy? Would we rather tell our kids lies about the world than introduce them to reality (in loving and appropriate ways of course)? Somedays I just have too many questions. Maybe I just need to stop watching Veggie Tales.

Read more
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
Julie Clawson

Julie Clawson
[email protected]
Writer, mother, dreamer, storyteller...

Search

Archives

Categories

"Everything in life is writable about if you have the outgoing guts to do it, and the imagination to improvise." - Sylvia Plath

All Are Welcome Here

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
RSS
Follow by Email
Facebook
Facebook
fb-share-icon
Instagram
Buy me a coffee QR code
Buy Me a Coffee
©2026 Julie Clawson | Theme by SuperbThemes