<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>onehandclapping &#187; injustice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://julieclawson.com/tag/injustice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://julieclawson.com</link>
	<description>incantations at the edge of uncertainty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:30:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Justice and Women</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2010/08/18/justice-and-women/</link>
		<comments>http://julieclawson.com/2010/08/18/justice-and-women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Clawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eduardo Galeano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feminist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Veins of Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postcolonial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/?p=1655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We live in a world full of pain and injustice; there is no getting around that fact. We can hide from the truth or try to protect ourselves from reality, but just because we don’t want to know about it doesn’t mean it doesn’t still exist. Our world does its best to hide its dark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We live in a world full of pain and injustice; there is no getting around that fact.  We can hide from the truth or try to protect ourselves from reality, but just because we don’t want to know about it doesn’t mean it doesn’t still exist.  Our world does its best to hide its dark side from consumer eyes and our school boards do their best to hide most of history from our children.  It takes work to keep our eyes open wide enough to see reality.  Thankfully, there are people out there who do try to be informed, who try to end injustice, to heal past wounds, and to make amends.  Yet recently, as I was reading Eduardo Galeano’s classic book  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Open-Veins-Latin-America-Centuries/dp/0853459908/" target="_blank">Open Veins of Latin America: Five Centuries of Pillage of a Continent</a>, I came across an almost casually mentioned atrocity that jolted me with the reminder that even for the people who are out there actively seeking to fight injustice, there remains one injustice that many would prefer to continue to ignore – the oppression of women.  Across the world it is women who often face the worst injustices and yet are often brushed aside as not important enough to seek justice for.</p>
<p>In writing about how the sugar cane industry has destroyed the land and economies of many Latin American countries and led to numerous human rights abuses, Galeano mentioned that in certain plantations in Brazil (at least as of his writing) it was common practice for the plantation owners to claim jus primae noctis, or, right of the first night with the daughters of their workers.  Most commonly known to us from the movie Braveheart this is a medieval custom giving to the Lord of an area the right to the virgin night of all the women he ruled.  Although in Medieval times the actual consummation was rarely if ever practiced as many families chose the option of “giving” the Lord the bride’s dowry instead (what the Lord was after anyway), Galeano reports that on the plantations the owners would demand the right to have their way with their workers’ 11-12 year old daughters in exchange for the worker remaining in their employment.  </p>
<p>Reading that affected me in a visceral way.  In the midst of a litany of oppression, I was reminded that women truly bear the brunt of injustice worldwide.  Their bodies are chattel, they aren’t deemed worthy of education, and they are fed leftovers if they get food at all.  Because they are women their oppression is magnified.  Not only must they endure the poverty and the colonialism, but also the objectification of their bodies and the required subjugation of their wills.  When voices for liberation or revolution arise the women are called upon to endure hardships and make sacrifices, but it is never their liberation that is fought for.  The few that call out for women’s needs to be addressed and for liberation to come to women are told that in light of the greater injustices and oppression that their cause is just a selfish distraction.  I hear it all the time in the church – there are just too many more important things to spend energy on than trying to bring justice to women.  We aren’t even worth the effort of those that make it a point to care about injustice and the oppressed.  </p>
<p>Feminist postcolonial theologians are quick to point out this imbalance.  They ask how can we say that we truly desire liberation if in achieving that liberation women still remain oppressed?  They repeatedly insist that equality and respect for women should never be an afterthought to be sought sometime after the real work of combating injustice is done, but an instead should be at the very foundation of what it means to seek liberation itself.  Nations and races cannot ever fully work for reconciliation and mutual respect if those nations are built upon oppression from within.  But sadly, theirs are not the voices that are commonly heard.</p>
<p>In reading non-Western theologies recently (both postcolonial and evangelical), I have in fact encountered the very opposite.  Men, who write on combating injustice and prejudice by calling the church to learn from say Korean or First Nation theologies and church practices, insist upon, as part of that process, an affirmation of gender roles that give men a strong (and sole) leadership role in the home, the community, and the church.  They see a firm affirmation of this hierarchy of men over women to be integral to ending race divisions in the church itself.  So not only are the needs of women ignored, healing and justice are proposed through the continued oppression and sacrifice of women.   </p>
<p>Injustice and oppression make me sick and prompt feelings of rage inside of me.  But reading about these young girls being raped as pawns in the never-ending cycle of colonial and commercial oppression left me feeling raw.  This isn’t just about greed and economics.  It isn’t just about racism and power-plays.  It’s rooted in a subjugation of women that denies our worth and turns us into mere objects for men to use as they see fit.  Most of the Western world hides behind their ignorance of history and injustice (often willfully sought) as an excuse to uphold the status quo.  But when even those who claim to care about justice say that speaking out of behalf of women isn’t worth the effort I can barely respond.   How can justice be justice if it is only for men?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://julieclawson.com/2010/08/18/justice-and-women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smashing Economic Idols</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2009/10/07/smashing-economic-idols/</link>
		<comments>http://julieclawson.com/2009/10/07/smashing-economic-idols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 19:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Clawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Everyday Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/?p=1223</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So I&#039;ve been having a few interesting conversations about my book Everyday Justice recently. I was being interviewed for a very conservative Christian talk radio show and when I mentioned that a simple way to define biblical justice was &#034;the practical outworking of loving God and loving others&#034; I was told that I need to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#039;ve been having a few interesting conversations about my book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Everyday-Justice-Global-Impact-Choices/dp/0830836284/" target="_blank"><em>Everyday Justice</em></a> recently.  I was being interviewed for a very conservative Christian talk radio show and when I mentioned that a simple way to define biblical justice was &#034;the practical outworking of loving God and loving others&#034; I was told that I need to be careful about encouraging people to love their neighbor because that could lead to socialism.  In the soundbite world of talk radio, there wasn&#039;t a chance to challenge that assertion, so I changed tactics and tried to talk about the need for Christians to embrace the spiritual discipline of simplicity and not be overcome by consumerism.  Once again I was contradicted by the host who told me that I shouldn&#039;t suggest that people stop or lower their consumption because it is our duty to support the economy by buying stuff.  At that point I realized that we were on totally different planets, civilly made my way through the rest of the interview trying to speak a language he might understand, and choose not to then listen for the next hour as he proceeded to tear apart everything I said.</p>
<p>I&#039;m fine with people disagreeing with me or not liking the book.  I get that.  But his mindset reminded me of the economic idolatry that has crept into our faith.  More and more I find Christians who instead of letting their faith influence their economics, they interpret their faith through their preferred economic system.  I&#039;ve had to listen to sermons where the pastor went off on how capitalism was the only biblical economic system.  I&#039;ve read the books where the guys say stuff like &#034;because the Bible doesn&#039;t talk much about economics we need to bring economics to the Bible.&#034;  I&#039;ve encountered those who play the &#034;socialism&#034; card at the first sign of any critique of capitalism. And I&#039;ve heard those claiming that economics are absolute, we can&#039;t change the market so we shouldn&#039;t bother trying even for good biblical reasons.</p>
<p>I get that&#039;s it&#039;s complicated.  I get that we like to have our pet philosophies.  I get that socialism can be evil too.  But none of that excuses making economics into an idol.  When our economic theory leads us to make excuses for the oppression of workers, we have a problem.  When modern day slavery is justified as being &#034;just the way the market works,&#034; we have a problem.  When making a profit becomes more important that the dignity of human beings, we have a problem.  When the words of Jesus Christ are dismissed because they might support an alternate economic system, we have a problem.  It is as simple as that.  When our allegiance to an economic system has us making excuses for injustices then that economic system has become an idol.  And idols need to be torn down.</p>
<p>I&#039;m a capitalist.  I&#039;m not anti-globalisation.  I don&#039;t have any problem with people making money or looking out for their own interests.  I don&#039;t think communism or forced socialism are better systems.  But there comes a point where we have to say to a system that oppresses &#8211; this is wrong and must be changed.  This is difficult if not impossible if we have allowed economic theory to become an idol and usurp our faith.  We need to be able to &#034;See to it that no one takes you captive through hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the basic principles of this world rather than on Christ.&#034; (Col 2:8)  Loving God and loving others has to come before Wall Street or Adam Smith &#8211; there&#039;s no way around it.</p>
<p>So as inspiration to smash the idols that need smashing, I want to include the following verse.  Brian Walsh, co-author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Colossians-Remixed-Subverting-Brian-Walsh/dp/0830827382/" target="_blank"><em>Colossians Remixed</em></a>, recently posted a targum of <a href="http://empireremixed.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/rom-1-16-32-targum-take-two.pdf" target="_blank">Romans 1:16-32</a> over at the <a href="http://empireremixed.com/" target="_blank">Empire Remixed</a> blog, A targum is a means of interpreting scripture by rewriting it for a particular cultural setting.  Traditionally a Hebrew practice, some use the practice today to apply the Bible to contemporary life.  This Romans 1 targum addresses this affinity to make idols of economic systems.  I highly recommend reading the entire piece, but I wanted to highlight this short section -</p>
<blockquote><p>So here’s the sad truth, my friends:<br />
this empire of greed,<br />
this narrative of economic growth,<br />
this whole house of cards is based on lies and deception.<br />
This whole culture of consumption,<br />
this whole empire of money,<br />
is based on self-willed ignorance.</p>
<p>Creation proclaims a better way<br />
because creation bears witness to a God of grace.<br />
But we have suppressed this truth,<br />
engaged in denial and cover-up.</p>
<p>Refusing to live a life of gratitude,<br />
refusing to live a life of thanks to the God<br />
who called forth such a rich creation,<br />
refusing to honour this Creator God,<br />
and embracing a culture of entitlement and ingratitude,<br />
we abandoned the God of light and embraced the dark.</p>
<p>And in all of our complex theories<br />
in all of our sophisticated and incomprehensible economic talk,<br />
we became futile in our thinking<br />
we ended up with lots of talk but no sense,<br />
theories that are empty,<br />
vanity of vanities.</p>
<p>And we thought that we were so wise,<br />
we thought that we had it all figured out,<br />
but the joke has been on us,<br />
and it is now clear that we have been fools.</p>
<p>You see, that’s what happens when you get in bed with idols.<br />
That’s what happens when you don’t image God in faithful justice,<br />
but embrace graven images,<br />
cheap imitations,<br />
that look so good,<br />
look so powerful,<br />
but will always fail you,<br />
will always come up short<br />
because they are impotent.</p>
<p>Empty idols, empty minds.<br />
Dumb idols, lives of foolishness.<br />
Betrayal and disappointment.<br />
Fear and terror.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://julieclawson.com/2009/10/07/smashing-economic-idols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympic Injustice</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2009/07/13/olympic-injustice/</link>
		<comments>http://julieclawson.com/2009/07/13/olympic-injustice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julie Clawson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brothel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[injustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logan Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taekwondo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/?p=1103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been following the news story of New Zealand Olympic hopeful Logan Campbell. If you haven&#039;t heard, he&#039;s the taekwondo athlete who said he was forced to open a brothel to cover his training expenses for the 2012 London Olympics. Prostitution is legal in New Zealand, but this has caused some to question if he [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;ve been following the <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/07/13/new.zealand.brothel.olympics/index.html#soundoff" target="_blank">news story</a> of New Zealand Olympic hopeful Logan Campbell.  If you haven&#039;t heard, he&#039;s the taekwondo athlete who said he was forced to open a brothel to cover his training expenses for the 2012 London Olympics.  Prostitution is legal in New Zealand, but this has caused some to question if he should be barred from the sport.  On one hand, I see how it would be difficult to uphold the taekwondo mandate that one always display high moral standards and respect others at all times if one is a pimp.  But I also think this incident hints at some of the deeper injustices prevalent in the Olympic games.</p>
<p>When a follower of a discipline that stresses the respect of others finds the need to oppress other in order to pay to continue in that discipline there are issues with the system.  The exorbitant costs of training athletes these days effectively leads to injustice of some sort.  Either only the wealthy are able to use their talents and compete in what is far from being an equal opportunity world competition.  Or athletes must sell their soul to their government to be trained, or they must oppress others to acquire the money they need.  This isn&#039;t about sports &#8211; or good sportsmanship &#8211; its about letting the privileged few succeed.</p>
<p>To make the economic disparity worse, just the occasion of hosting the Olympics itself results in the oppression of the poor.  As cities create huge stadiums and hotels to accommodate the event, they generally raze lower-income housing developments in the process.  The poor get displaced in the name of the event.  In 1988, some 720,000 people were forcibly displaced in Seoul, South Korea, in preparation for the Summer Olympic Games.  And some 1.5 million Chinese were forced from their homes during preparations for the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games.  And even though Mayor Daley has said no one will be displaced if Chicago wins its 2016 Olympic bid, it is obvious that the property value increase will effectively force lower-income renters out of areas surrounding the Olympic village.  But that still might be better than having Rio de Janeiro win the bid (one of the other 4 finalist cities). It is common knowledge that local businesses in Rio fund &#034;death squads&#034; to clean up their streets.  They want the poor street kids to disappear and pay the squads to make it happen &#8211; especially before big events like the World Cup.  A recent congressional study revealed that in Rio de Janeiro alone at least 180 different death squads operate. Fifteen of these groups target children exclusively and work &#034;under the protection of the police and justice system,&#034; according to Congresswoman Rita Camata. The investigation named 103 people&#8211;including lawyers, police and former police officers&#8211;involved in death squads that murder children.</p>
<p>In truth I love the Olympics. The Olympics are one of the few times I ever watch sports.  I support the idea &#8211; letting the world come together to share their gifts and talents through the common language of sport.  But not when it is just a guise for injustice.  When it encourages the disparity between rich and poor.  When it has a man selling women as chattel to fund his training.  When it has cities hiding away their poor &#8211; displacing or worse, slaughtering them &#8211; in order to present a &#034;clean&#034; face to the world.  The official goal of the Olympic movement is stated as &#8211; &#034;to contribute to building a peaceful and better world by educating youth through sport practised without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play.&#034;  But the question must be asked &#8211; are they really building a better world or just helping injustice flourish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://julieclawson.com/2009/07/13/olympic-injustice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

