Skip to content

Third Sunday of Advent 2010

2010 December 12
by Julie Clawson

As I explore the unexpected places God showed up in our story of Christmas, I think the most unsettling to our modern sensibilities how God was revealed to the Magi. It is one of those stories that we often try to explain away. We ignore the text that names these visitors to the Christ child as Magi and translate them as the more acceptable “wise men.” It makes for cute evangelistic cards that proclaim “wise men still seek him,” but it ignores the unexpected way God showed up.

Scholars aren’t certain, but tradition holds that the Magi were the actual historical Magi from Persia. Followers of the teachings of Zoroaster, they looked to the stars for wisdom. If they were official Persian Magi, then their tradition would have had access to the religious writing of the Israelites. For after the exile when the Persian emperor Cyrus permitted the rich and elite Jews who had been exiled by the Babylonians to return to rebuild Jerusalem, many of them chose not to go. They were the elites of the land – the royal families and the scholars; the comforts of an established society that valued their wisdom was far more enticing that roughing it in a backwater province that had been left in ruin. So it is a near certainty that these scholars of Judaism interacted with and shared their knowledge with the educated elite among the Persians. Even if the Matthew gospel included the story only to convey the idea that all nations will worship Jesus, it still suggests the same meaning – God shows up in other cultures and religious groups.

That is the part that freaks people out a bit and why the revelation is so unexpected. In our modern attempts to domesticate the story, we either ignore who the Magi were or we explain them away as converts to Judaism. We have allowed our expectations of how we assume God to work to remove the power from this story. God showed up unexpectedly not just to those who were told that an anointed one was coming, but also to those truth-seekers following a different path. Truth was revealed through their culture and their religious practices – and this is part of our Christmas story.

To even talk about this is unexpected. The exclusivity of Christianity has become a totalizing thing for most Christians. Insisting that Jesus is the reason for the season often has less to do with a commitment to Jesus as it does a rejection of other cultural practices. Hearing how God shows up in other cultures is unexpected because it is the last thing people often want to hear. But God does not play by our rules (thankfully). God shows up where God desires to show up. We have the testimony of the Nativity story to affirm that truth, perhaps we should stop letting it unsettle us so.

Share
3 Responses leave one →
  1. December 12, 2010

    A few years ago on Epiphany my pastor mentioned that the Magi probably weren't Jewish since astrology is forbidden in the Torah. Which once again show how . . . oh, what's the word I'm looking for? . . . upside down the birth of Christ was. Here's the King of kings, and where is He? Sleeping in feeding trough among farm animals. Well then I'm sure the religious leaders must have known what was going on and they stopped by to see their king, right? Nope! Instead, shepherds (who were the at the bottom of the social totem pole) and non-Jewish astrologers come to worship Him.

  2. December 13, 2010

    I guess I am lucky that I have never been subjected to the twisted version. In my faith tradition, the Magi have always been understood as gentile pagans. I stand in awe of the inverted power which lies at the heart of this story — and beyond it.

    Trace James' blog had a similar take this week (inspired by your God Showed Up post). Here is a quote from it which highlights how truly upside-down the broader narrative truly is. I love it.

    What? A birth story in which a bunch of unbelieving, unwashed Gentiles from somewhere out by Persia who engage in the abominable practice of star-gazing acknowledge messiah? They are the only ones who gift and honor the young king? But the people who say they hope for messiah are too frightened to show up at his birth, even though their scholars know from the old texts where he will be born; they tell the Gentile delegation but they do not go to the king themselves?! And before the officials of your people can respond, the child and his parents must flee into Egypt because it is safer for them there than it is in the land of promise! And when the officials do finally respond, it is by killing all the male children in the town under the age of two!

    Look! This is so crazy; so upside down! The safe place is Egypt and the Egyptian thing, killing male babies, straight from the pages of Exodus, goes on in the suburbs of Jerusalem by order of the authorities of your people. And then the young family, financed as they are by pagan, Gentile gold, return from Egypt to the land of promise, but they must avoid messiah’s capital and go instead down to the dirty, Gentile-infested trade town of Nazareth because it is not safe for the descendant of David to reside anywhere near the City of David, the holy city and its environs.

  3. December 13, 2010

    One note of clarification of what I quoted above. Trace is speaking in first-person as Matthew might have spoken to his original audience.

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS