Michelle Obama’s Health Campaign

2010 March 18
by Julie Clawson

MObama-Obesity-FE04-330-verticalI enjoyed reading Michelle Obama’s recent cover article in Newsweek on her campaign to end childhood obesity. While it was mostly an ad for her “Let’s Move” program, it took a decent look at how we can empower parents, schools, and the community to battle childhood obesity. I agree we are at a crisis point in our nation on this issue, and it will eventually end up costing all of us if we don’t do something to fix the problem. I admire Michelle Obama’s commitment to this cause, but wish she would really push her attempts further. She writes about ending the obesity problem -

Achieving all this won’t be easy. This isn’t something we can fix with a bill in Congress or an executive order from the president. I’ve spoken with many experts about this issue, and not a single one has said that the solution to childhood obesity is to have the government tell people what to do.

Instead, it’s about what all of us can do to help our kids lead active, healthy lives: parents making healthier choices for their families; mayors and governors doing their part to build healthier cities and states; and the private sector doing its part as well—from food manufacturers offering healthier options to retailers understanding that what’s good for kids and families can be good for businesses too.

food subsidiesOf course we all should be doing what we can to help with this, but I have to disagree that this isn’t something the government can fix. I know she has to tread carefully here, any suggestion from her that the government might dare interfere in private lives will get her slapped with outraged accusations of socialism. But the thing is the government can be blamed for a good deal of the problem, so they are going to have to be the ones to fix it. When our government subsidizes the crops used in junk food (corn, cheap beef…) and not healthy fruits and vegetables, they create the condition that forces poor families to buy food that is bad for them since they cannot afford the healthy stuff. Do that long enough and our body gets used to certain tastes, it builds up a craving for sugar, sodium, and fat that is hard to undo. If this country is serious about ending this health crisis it will take a government order to drastically change the way our country subsidizes food. This isn’t the government telling people what to do, but creating a environment in which they are able to make good choices.

The government also has the power to stand up to the agri-businesses and corporations that control food in our country. It’s been done before for the sake of our children’s health. As public schools were entering into more and more contracts with vending companies (often granting exclusive rights to these companies) in order to make ends meets, the government had to step in to protect the health of children. Many of these contracts granted exclusive rights to sell beverages at the school to a soft-drink company, essentially prohibiting the sale of milk. The government had to pass a law exempting milk from these contracts so as to make it available to kids in schools. Since then, further laws have been passed prohibiting the sale or advertizing of “foods of minimal nutritional value” in schools altogether. The government protected our kids from the greed of corporations in these instances, why can they not do so again?

Take the meat industry’s laws prohibiting anyone from criticizing meat and influencing people not to eat it. Just mentioning the chemicals, fillers, and diseases present in meat can be grounds for being sued off your ass by the meat industry. They are so protected by these food libel laws that the law states even if they lose they don’t have to pay your court fees. Even Oprah wasn’t rich enough to stand up to them. After questioning meat on her show and being sued, she eventually settled out of court and was bullied into silence on this issue. Laws like this that protect the very people harming us should not be allowed in this country. It is going to take the government to stand up to injustices like this that threaten our health. And it will take an advocate like Michelle Obama leading the charge.

There are bigger issues here than just encouraging everyone to make lifestyle changes. Of course ending the health crisis will require us all to make sacrifices for the greater good. But it will also take the government choosing to care more for the health of the nation than it does the interests of corporations. I don’t care if it “sounds” socialist or big brothery – if throwing around those names is all it takes to opt out of really helping people then we truly are beyond hope. Childhood obesity affects us all – and our food system needs major overhaul if we are ever going to see the crisis reversed. And no matter how uncomfortable it might be, that is going to require government intervention.

7 Responses leave one →
  1. Katherine permalink
    March 18, 2010

    Great column. I’m fascinated by the way social, economic and political factors make eating well easier or harder, and many of them are quite hidden. The diagrams are a real eye-opener – where did they come from?

  2. March 18, 2010

    As soon as I read your opening paragraph, I thought, “Well, of course, the government can do something. They have to stop subsidizing corn, sugar, etc and get out the meat industry and … etc.” All the points you so eloquently made. Very nicely done, Julie. In the end, it’s going to take a joint effort by private choices and public venture to actually step AWAY from socialism … which is what some of those subsidies are and those no-libel laws are … to end obesity in this country.

    On a side note that is pertinent to this … my husband and I joined Weight Watchers late last year and have been (re)learning how to eat normal portion sizes, etc. We have a great meeting leader who we really resonate with. However, he took a vacation for a few weeks and we had a substitute for those two weeks. What a horror. The woman kept pushing diet foods for snacks … you know the stuff? All the substitute food that is low calorie, but not real food in the processed food part of the grocery store. A lot of those foods have replaced the fat with sugars … which end up making you crave sugar and … yep, fat.

    There it is again … that real food vs. processed food battle. It’s so difficult even for well-educated and informed customers to find their way through a grocery store to the good stuff, and for people who struggle with any kind of reading disorder? Learning issues? Can you imagine trying to get through a grocery store??? It’s sick …

  3. March 18, 2010

    our school just set a new requirement that snacks that get sent in are “healthy”. and by the list, they are still barely “healthful”.

    even still, the conservative talk show hosts ate us alive calling us “idiots”– our whole community! just faceless idiots we are to suggest that children deserve healthy food at snack time. lunchtime, mind you, is still up for grabs.

    but as i’ve heard, it’s a “slippery slope” to full-on socialism and communism.

    you know, first you replace flaming hot doritos with apples, and before you know it, people are standing in line for bread.

    (P.S. a lot of the kids in our district can’t afford bread.)

  4. March 19, 2010

    It’s crazy, and those diet foods are the worst. They are marketed to vulnerable people and end up making things worse for them as they make money off of them. My daughter’s private preschool has a very “rules” – like no chips, cookies, or chocolate in lunches, but I’ve also realized how hard it is to pack healthy stuff when it has to fit in a lunch box. And of course after I wrote this I went and heated up leftover corned beef and cabbage from St. Pattys day for dinner :)

  5. March 19, 2010

    Damn. This is excellent.

  6. don thomas permalink
    May 24, 2010

    Your article is so intellegently written! I am a very young 50 year old grandfather of seven, and I am concerned for their future health. We really have a serious problem with ethics in our nation,when our justice department protects injustices . I beleive it is because everything is tradable in the U.S., and true patriotism has been sold. It seems like all of our trust and values are in the dollar god!

Trackbacks and Pingbacks

  1. Links for March 19th | jonathan stegall: creative tension

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS