<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should Christians Apologize?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 05:46:37 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: On White Manʹs Religion &#171; thomstark.net</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-5896</link>
		<dc:creator>On White Manʹs Religion &#171; thomstark.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 03:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-5896</guid>
		<description>[...] the whole story here.      Share this post!  Twitter Digg Facebook Delicious StumbleUpon Google Bookmarks LinkedIn [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the whole story here.      Share this post!  Twitter Digg Facebook Delicious StumbleUpon Google Bookmarks LinkedIn [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>very true</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thom Stark &#187; On White Man&#8217;s Religion</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Thom Stark &#187; On White Man&#8217;s Religion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 09:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the whole story here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the whole story here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Meanderings &#171; The Way of a Pilgrim</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2851</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Meanderings &#171; The Way of a Pilgrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2851</guid>
		<description>[...] came across this week (a whole lot of NPR&#8230;what does that say about me?). 1. The problem with “me-centric” Christianity  2. I find myself doing this with people walking their dogs…then I feel bad  3. Strangers bring [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] came across this week (a whole lot of NPR&#8230;what does that say about me?). 1. The problem with “me-centric” Christianity  2. I find myself doing this with people walking their dogs…then I feel bad  3. Strangers bring [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin ady</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2824</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin ady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2824</guid>
		<description>Tyler--by the way--and I realize this is way off topic--but I see you are reading watership down.  Isn&#039;t it just magical?  It&#039;s one of my all time favorites =).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler&#8211;by the way&#8211;and I realize this is way off topic&#8211;but I see you are reading watership down.  Isn&#8217;t it just magical?  It&#8217;s one of my all time favorites =).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin ady</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin ady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 16:38:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2823</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If it wasn’t for the “toxic” faith of the church in history then we wouldn’t have any semblance of what it means to follow Jesus. We literally wouldn’t be able to do it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey Tyler--welcome to the conversation.  You ask reasonable questions =)

  I&#039;m wondering if you can elaborate a little on this theme?  Would you say that Jesus was &quot;toxic&quot; in the sense in which Julie is using the word?  Or the early (book of Acts) church was toxic in that sense?  Or are you talking post Constantine?  Or are you saying that since the only way we could *receive* Christianity as transmitted through people over 2000 years is through toxic people, since people are in their nature toxic?  

  Or am I totally misunderstanding you altogether? 

  &#039;Cause it seems kind of circular to say &quot;Well, we wouldn&#039;t be humans if we weren&#039;t toxic, therefore we shouldn&#039;t criticize ourselves too harshly for being toxic.&quot;  Although there is a certain truth to that. Overzealous self-criticism is hardly any more productive than overzealous other-criticism, I suppose.  Progress not perfection--is that what you&#039;re saying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If it wasn’t for the “toxic” faith of the church in history then we wouldn’t have any semblance of what it means to follow Jesus. We literally wouldn’t be able to do it.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hey Tyler&#8211;welcome to the conversation.  You ask reasonable questions =)</p>
<p>  I&#8217;m wondering if you can elaborate a little on this theme?  Would you say that Jesus was &#8220;toxic&#8221; in the sense in which Julie is using the word?  Or the early (book of Acts) church was toxic in that sense?  Or are you talking post Constantine?  Or are you saying that since the only way we could *receive* Christianity as transmitted through people over 2000 years is through toxic people, since people are in their nature toxic?  </p>
<p>  Or am I totally misunderstanding you altogether? </p>
<p>  &#8216;Cause it seems kind of circular to say &#8220;Well, we wouldn&#8217;t be humans if we weren&#8217;t toxic, therefore we shouldn&#8217;t criticize ourselves too harshly for being toxic.&#8221;  Although there is a certain truth to that. Overzealous self-criticism is hardly any more productive than overzealous other-criticism, I suppose.  Progress not perfection&#8211;is that what you&#8217;re saying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Stewart</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Stewart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>Julie,
I&#039;m coming to this conversation a little late. I read your post via Thom Stark&#039;s fine little blog. Anyway, I was wondering what is your role in the church? I agree entirely with your overall point. We as Christians ought to be the first to apologize and repent for the sins of our past. It does bother me, however, that you seem to refer to Christianity wholesale as &quot;toxic.&quot; If it wasn&#039;t for the &quot;toxic&quot; faith of the church in history then we wouldn&#039;t have any semblance of what it means to follow Jesus. We literally wouldn&#039;t be able to do it. So, I guess I&#039;m questioning the severity of your criticism against the church. I welcome a response and for you to check out my blog where I&#039;ll be starting a similar thread on race and reconciliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie,<br />
I&#8217;m coming to this conversation a little late. I read your post via Thom Stark&#8217;s fine little blog. Anyway, I was wondering what is your role in the church? I agree entirely with your overall point. We as Christians ought to be the first to apologize and repent for the sins of our past. It does bother me, however, that you seem to refer to Christianity wholesale as &#8220;toxic.&#8221; If it wasn&#8217;t for the &#8220;toxic&#8221; faith of the church in history then we wouldn&#8217;t have any semblance of what it means to follow Jesus. We literally wouldn&#8217;t be able to do it. So, I guess I&#8217;m questioning the severity of your criticism against the church. I welcome a response and for you to check out my blog where I&#8217;ll be starting a similar thread on race and reconciliation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: liz</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 03:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t really get the relevance of this question Benjamin? But I will answer anyway: no question if it was my kids or my husband or my closest friends. Honestly, I don&#039;t know I would do it for a stranger or someone I disliked. But thats the difference between God and I. At least I am honest. I have actually gone through a lot of years of emotional hell for those I love. I don&#039;t really care to share my story, but I have faced it, not physical harm but much emotional pain. The wellbeing of those I loved was more important than my emotional pain. I have been courageous, I have done the right thing. You really don&#039;t know how you would respond until it comes on you. It was all god. my strength came from him. I chose to do the right thing and god gave me strength and did it through me. Thats all I will say. And yes, if it meant killing someone else to protect my child or my husband I certainly would hope I could do it. What then would be the greater evil: watch my loved one die or kill some scumbag? No question there. I can&#039;t say I wouldn&#039;t be a chicken because I am far from the bravest person in the world but at least I hope that is what I would do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really get the relevance of this question Benjamin? But I will answer anyway: no question if it was my kids or my husband or my closest friends. Honestly, I don&#8217;t know I would do it for a stranger or someone I disliked. But thats the difference between God and I. At least I am honest. I have actually gone through a lot of years of emotional hell for those I love. I don&#8217;t really care to share my story, but I have faced it, not physical harm but much emotional pain. The wellbeing of those I loved was more important than my emotional pain. I have been courageous, I have done the right thing. You really don&#8217;t know how you would respond until it comes on you. It was all god. my strength came from him. I chose to do the right thing and god gave me strength and did it through me. Thats all I will say. And yes, if it meant killing someone else to protect my child or my husband I certainly would hope I could do it. What then would be the greater evil: watch my loved one die or kill some scumbag? No question there. I can&#8217;t say I wouldn&#8217;t be a chicken because I am far from the bravest person in the world but at least I hope that is what I would do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benjamin ady</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>benjamin ady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 02:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>Liz,

  Because of your immense unkindness toward me, as well as your ongoing lack of response to my own questions, I&#039;m not going to respond to the horrific and traumatic hypothetical you pose.  But here&#039;s a reciprocal hypothetical for you. This is a serious question.

  What would you do if a group of highly placed powerful people in the U.S. government arrested the person you loved most in all the universe, and tortured and mocked him or her over the course of about 12 hours, and then crucified him or her naked on the mall on Washington D.C., and left him or her there to die the torturous death of the victim of crucifixion, and you had the power to stop them, and more than just stop them--you had the power to unexist them?

  What if you could trade some specific amount of your own suffering for the guarantee of an end to all suffering?  How much would you be willing to trade? What sort of security would you want on the guarantee?

  I know I wouldn&#039;t be willing to trade very much at all.  How do I know this?  I know this by taking a wee peek into the amount of suffering I could currently alleviate by making a few simple changes, which I generally fail to make.  My history seems to indicate that I&#039;m unwilling to make many changes until I grow to love myself or another enough that my or their pain becomes more horrible than the pain of making the change.  Which in a sense makes me very much part of the human race.

Aslan says &quot;No one is allowed to no what &#039;would have happened&#039;&quot;

And Corrie Ten Boom&#039;s father says &quot;When do I give you the train ticket, Corrie?&quot;  to which she replies &quot;Just before we board the train, daddy&quot;.  Which in a sense means noone is allowed to know what *will* happen, nor even what they *will* do.  We can of course dream about what we would do.  I wonder if Corrie occasionally wished she could have crushed with mighty power the evil unkind guards who oversaw her time in Auschwitz?  I bet she did.  But I bet she didn&#039;t go with that.  I bet she was glad when the thought retreated, to come and attack again at a later time.  I wonder if some part of her reveled in the trial and execution of Adolf Eichmann in 1962?  I rather suspect that some part of her did, and that she realized that this part of her was not the best part of her, and fought it.  Of course that is all speculation.

  Is there some third way, or must be choose be either the victim or the perp?  Some wise person said to me, the last time I asked that question online, that the truth is we are constantly doing both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liz,</p>
<p>  Because of your immense unkindness toward me, as well as your ongoing lack of response to my own questions, I&#8217;m not going to respond to the horrific and traumatic hypothetical you pose.  But here&#8217;s a reciprocal hypothetical for you. This is a serious question.</p>
<p>  What would you do if a group of highly placed powerful people in the U.S. government arrested the person you loved most in all the universe, and tortured and mocked him or her over the course of about 12 hours, and then crucified him or her naked on the mall on Washington D.C., and left him or her there to die the torturous death of the victim of crucifixion, and you had the power to stop them, and more than just stop them&#8211;you had the power to unexist them?</p>
<p>  What if you could trade some specific amount of your own suffering for the guarantee of an end to all suffering?  How much would you be willing to trade? What sort of security would you want on the guarantee?</p>
<p>  I know I wouldn&#8217;t be willing to trade very much at all.  How do I know this?  I know this by taking a wee peek into the amount of suffering I could currently alleviate by making a few simple changes, which I generally fail to make.  My history seems to indicate that I&#8217;m unwilling to make many changes until I grow to love myself or another enough that my or their pain becomes more horrible than the pain of making the change.  Which in a sense makes me very much part of the human race.</p>
<p>Aslan says &#8220;No one is allowed to no what &#8216;would have happened&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>And Corrie Ten Boom&#8217;s father says &#8220;When do I give you the train ticket, Corrie?&#8221;  to which she replies &#8220;Just before we board the train, daddy&#8221;.  Which in a sense means noone is allowed to know what *will* happen, nor even what they *will* do.  We can of course dream about what we would do.  I wonder if Corrie occasionally wished she could have crushed with mighty power the evil unkind guards who oversaw her time in Auschwitz?  I bet she did.  But I bet she didn&#8217;t go with that.  I bet she was glad when the thought retreated, to come and attack again at a later time.  I wonder if some part of her reveled in the trial and execution of Adolf Eichmann in 1962?  I rather suspect that some part of her did, and that she realized that this part of her was not the best part of her, and fought it.  Of course that is all speculation.</p>
<p>  Is there some third way, or must be choose be either the victim or the perp?  Some wise person said to me, the last time I asked that question online, that the truth is we are constantly doing both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/comment-page-2/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 01:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/05/08/should-christians-apologize/#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>i want to ask you something Benjamin. This is a serious question. What would you do if some guy broke into your apartment and meant harm to your wife and kids. lets also, hypothetically say, since i am sure you would not own a gun, and usually it is stupid for people to try and &quot;play hero&quot; against a criminal. But lets just say that you study martial arts and have reached a high enough belt rank that you know, in theory, you could totally and completely put this guy out. lets conveniently ignore the fact that martial arts also teach to use no more force than neccessary and assume that for whatever reason, you know that you will have to use enough force to seriously injure or possibly kill this guy. What do you do? Do you let him kill, rape and God knows what all else your wife and daughters? Or do you counterattack and hope for the best? I really want to know the answer to this. I am not going to talk back to you because I think the answer to this is going to settle some stuff for me in my mind. I just really want to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i want to ask you something Benjamin. This is a serious question. What would you do if some guy broke into your apartment and meant harm to your wife and kids. lets also, hypothetically say, since i am sure you would not own a gun, and usually it is stupid for people to try and &#8220;play hero&#8221; against a criminal. But lets just say that you study martial arts and have reached a high enough belt rank that you know, in theory, you could totally and completely put this guy out. lets conveniently ignore the fact that martial arts also teach to use no more force than neccessary and assume that for whatever reason, you know that you will have to use enough force to seriously injure or possibly kill this guy. What do you do? Do you let him kill, rape and God knows what all else your wife and daughters? Or do you counterattack and hope for the best? I really want to know the answer to this. I am not going to talk back to you because I think the answer to this is going to settle some stuff for me in my mind. I just really want to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
