Religion Fit for Public Consumption
I was reading about the history of Christianity in America the other day and I came across an interesting phrase. The author was addressing the ongoing need in our nation for there to exist “a religion fit for public consumption.” Such a religion of course serves not only to unify people but to create decent and compliant citizens. In essence it exists as both the opiate of the masses and the backbone of the country. It is something the Founding Fathers saw as a necessary element in creating a society even if they imagined themselves above participating.
I was struck at how tied to such a religion we Americans tend to be. This is a religion that dovetails with our lives as they already are. It shores up our economic systems, promotes civic duty and pride, and never attempts to challenge the status quo. It meets basic spiritual needs, helps create healthy social networks, and helps promote moral systems. Such a religion is safe, fit for public consumption, FDA Approved so to speak.
So it is no wonder that religious movements that challenge the civic system are derided or labeled heretical. Instead of appropriately keeping the system running, these religious movements counter-culturally offer revolutionary challenges. They don’t support life as it already is, but offer alternatives that question the basic assumptions and values of such ways. Their leaders ask hard questions and make uncomfortable statements. These religions are less about something the public consumes and more about leading lives of transformative justice, love, and mercy. You know the sort of stuff the Bible refers to as “true religion.”
These aren’t religions that form the backbone of a nation. Anything that retains the right to question the nations will never get it’s stamp of approval. A religion that actually affects the lives of its followers in radical ways is not “a religion fit for public consumption.” It never will be. So why do I still see more churches caring about being fit for public consumption than about following true religion? How have we been so deceived into idolatry?
julieclawson(at)gmail(dot)com 

Perhaps we could put Jeremiah Wright in such a “heretical” category?
I appreciate this post a lot. Consumerism is the religion of America and the religion of most of American religion. It seems like we follow Jesus in order to write books and sell CDs.
This post made me think back to the Council at Nicea, called at the behest of Constantine who wanted the new state religion to stop bickering so much over theology. He wanted a united religion that he could use to endorse the state.
The result? The Nicene Creed, arguably the church’s biggest, and longest lasting power grab to define what it means to be “Christian.”
Thanks for the post.
Idolatry indeed.
Great connections Julie. As a woman raised in the Plymouth Brethren church will large doses of dispensationalism thrown in I still can’t seem to shake the idea that this looks far more like the “anti-christ” than the peaceful leaders that are regularly pointed to ever could be.
Jeremiah Wright is an excellent example of a NFFPC religious leader. His only heresy is not against Christianity but against American Civil Religion.