<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And so the witchhunts continue&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/</link>
	<description>incantations at the edge of uncertainty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minnow</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Minnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 09:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>Julie--
Again, is dialogue only meaningful if the result is to your liking?
&quot;gathering names for later use&quot;  Sounds a little paranoid.
Perhaps the administration is wrong.  Maybe as dialogue continues &quot;they&quot; will see that it is the policy that needs to be changed and not the &quot;policy breaker&quot; who needs to be disciplined.  Or maybe &quot;they&quot; will chose to hold their ground and on-lookers and potential students will have more information on which to base their support/attentance/disagreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julie&#8211;<br />
Again, is dialogue only meaningful if the result is to your liking?<br />
&#034;gathering names for later use&#034;  Sounds a little paranoid.<br />
Perhaps the administration is wrong.  Maybe as dialogue continues &#034;they&#034; will see that it is the policy that needs to be changed and not the &#034;policy breaker&#034; who needs to be disciplined.  Or maybe &#034;they&#034; will chose to hold their ground and on-lookers and potential students will have more information on which to base their support/attentance/disagreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minstrel Ayreon</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-2561</link>
		<dc:creator>Minstrel Ayreon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 03:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/#comment-2561</guid>
		<description>So what exactly set people off?  I can&#039;t see how expecting the Bible to reflect its cultural context is a problem.  Unless I&#039;m really missing something as to what this book is about...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what exactly set people off?  I can&#039;t see how expecting the Bible to reflect its cultural context is a problem.  Unless I&#039;m really missing something as to what this book is about&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julie Clawson</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>Julie Clawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 16:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>Whatever dialogue there was apparently was meaningless.  The faculty voted in favor of him, the dialogue showed he was supported, and still this occurred.  If an authority can sweep in and render dialogue meaningless, is it really valued in that community?  Or is it just a way of gathering names and information for later use...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever dialogue there was apparently was meaningless.  The faculty voted in favor of him, the dialogue showed he was supported, and still this occurred.  If an authority can sweep in and render dialogue meaningless, is it really valued in that community?  Or is it just a way of gathering names and information for later use&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minnow</title>
		<link>http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/comment-page-1/#comment-2559</link>
		<dc:creator>Minnow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://julieclawson.com/2008/03/28/and-so-the-witchhunts-continue/#comment-2559</guid>
		<description>After reading the article, it seems to me that there is dialogue has been dialogue and will continue to be dialogue.  Be careful you don&#039;t accuse folks of not dialoguing simply because they also act in a way in which you disaprove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading the article, it seems to me that there is dialogue has been dialogue and will continue to be dialogue.  Be careful you don&#039;t accuse folks of not dialoguing simply because they also act in a way in which you disaprove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

